0

Understanding Plastic Ban In India And Worldwide : Part III

I still see plastics around!

That is true. Plastics have not been completely abolished.  They are being phased out starting from a few (19) items that have been banned from July 1, 2022 and by increasing the thickness of plastic bags gradually in phases. The Extended Producers Responsibility guidelines notified in February 2022 also sets gradually scaled up targets for plastic recycling, making it mandatory for producers, importers and brand-owners to recycle up to 50 per cent of the plastic they use or produce over the next three years. Even as per the PWMR, any similar notification introducing prohibition in future shall not come into force before the expiry of ten years from the date of its publication.

What is not banned?

All of us know or are fond of Pepsico and Coke drinks/products. However, the less known fact about them is that the Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo are ranked as the world’s top plastic polluters for the 4th consecutive year in 2021 according to Global Brand Audit Report of Break Free From Plastic.[1] As apparent enough, these bottles are not banned. Further, PET bottles having a liquid holding capacity of 200 ml or more with deposit and refund price or buy-back price under EPR printed on them; recyclable plastic stationery products used at office and educational institutions; thermocol boxes to preserve fish in the fishery business; plastic for packaging of medical equipment and medical products; plastic items like bottles, tiffins and boxes used for domestic purposes; recyclable multi-layered plastic items like chips packets, shampoo sachets, oil packets and chocolate packets; virgin plastic bags used for milk (having a thickness of not less than 50 microns and must be printed with a buy-back price); paper-based carton packaging using one or more layers of plastic; compostable plastic bags used for horticulture, agriculture, plant nurseries and solid waste handling; plastic packaging material with more than 50-micron thickness, a minimum of two grams weight used to seal groceries and grain products at wholesale and retail stores and manufacture of plastic bags for export purposes in export-oriented units and Special Economic Zones – are not banned.[2]

Why are plastics being phased and not completely banned?

Plastics are monstrously destroying life on planet.[3] A shocking 91 per cent of all plastic is single-use which is being used for the last 6 decades. As per US Chronicle, “The problem is so serious that the United Nations has identified single-use plastics as one of the world’s biggest environmental challenges of modern times”.[4] In this background, a natural question ascends that why then single-use plastics are not being completely banned? The answer is not simple. The manufacturers argue that why they should stop producing when there is a clear demand. Consumer lament that they do not have an equally good alternative. The options available are not only inconvenient but also economically unsustainable.  Then the end buyers may not carry the shopping bag every time they are at sale point – there could be unplanned purchases too. Of all the issues, the most pressing is that of lack of an eco-friendly product, which is a complete substitute of the plastic in all uses. Such product has not been found till date.[5] Paper bags are also not the solution. Firstly, the energy required to produce 500 grams of paper (used to make carry bag) is 300 times more than that required for a plastic bag and secondly, it cannot withstand weight and gets easily spoilt especially when it rains.[6] Paper bags are not mostly reusable. In the absence of a suitable alternative, therefore, it shall be impractical nay unwelcome step to impose a blanket ban on the use of plastics or on all items made of single-use plastics.

The increase in thickness of plastics as a Government measure, will have two substantial consequences. The thick plastic is costly to produce. This may lead to less production of plastic bags and even lesser purchase of such plastic bags. There are also chances that if the thickness of certain materials is increased, it will encourage people to re-use those, leading to less littering.

Punishments and Penalties

The production, sale and use of single-use plastic and pollution caused due to its littering is further directly connected to the penalties prescribed under the law and how strictly is the law  being implemented on ground. The sanction for violating the rules is provided in the Environment Protection Act, 1986 under which the two Rules i.e. Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 and Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016 have been formulated. The implementation, however, shall be done by local civic bodies’ who shall take decisions on punitive actions including fines and jail terms through the bye-laws.

Environment Protection Act

As per Section 15 of the Act, the contravention of the use of banned identified single-use plastic items may attract a penalty of imprisonment for a maximum term of five years or with maximum fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-, or with both. In case contravention continues, there may be imposed an additional fine which may extend to Rs. 5,000/- for every day during which such failure or contravention continues after the conviction for the first such failure or contravention. The relevant section has been reproduced herein below:

15. PENALTY FOR CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT AND THE RULES, ORDERS AND DIRECTIONS.-

(1) Whoever fails to comply with or contravenes any of the provisions of this Act, or the rules made or orders or directions issued thereunder, shall, in respect of each such failure or contravention, be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both, and in case the failure or contravention continues, with additional fine which may extend to five thousand rupees for every day during which such failure or contravention continues after the conviction for the first such failure or contravention.

(2) If the failure or contravention referred to in sub-section (1) continues beyond a period of one year after the date of conviction, the offender shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years.

Are penalties in operation?

Yes, they are. On July 1, 2022, when the nation-wide ban on single-use plastic items kicked in, Mr. Gopal Rai, Delhi Environment Minister said that the penalties for violating the ban will be imposed only after July 10, 2022. For a month, there shall also be a pre-planned pan-India awareness campaign from July 1 to July 31. Accordingly on July 10, in Delhi, a control room to monitor the implementation of the ban has been set up by the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC). Any complaint regarding violations can be made to the control room which shall transfer the complaint to the municipal bodies. Additionally, the Revenue Department and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee have respectively constituted 33 and 15 teams to ensure the enforcement of the ban across the State. Any violation shall attract a penalty under Environment Protection Act to be imposed by Revenue Department. The MCD shall separately take action as per the bye-law. Any grievances regarding the violations can also be lodged through the Green Delhi application of the Delhi Government or the “SUP-CPCB” application of the Central Pollution Control Board.

The Delhi Government, on 15th September, 2021, had separately notified Draft of Plastic Waste Management Bye-laws, 2021 applicable within the territorial limits of South Delhi Municipal Corporation, East Delhi Municipal Corporation, North Delhi Municipal Corporation, New Delhi Municipal Council and Delhi Cantonment Board.[7] The law defines penalties for various violations totaling to 19 as listed in Schedule-I of the draft bye-laws.

Some municipal bodies in other states like Tamil Nadu have been taking action under their bye-laws much before 1st July. Recently, a Division Bench of Madras High Court was told by the Greater Chennai Corporation that 47,961 shops were inspected and 20,056 kg of banned plastics seized by the authorities between August 19, 2021 and March 18 2022. The Court was informed by the officer of the municipal body that the repeat offenders would be liable for cancellation of their trade license. Such shops would be closed and sealed. The Municipal Corporation is also currently intensifying its endeavor to systematically dispose of the plastics and also create awareness amongst the traders and plastic manufacturers associations. The local body is also distributing cloth bags free cost.

The bye laws governing the functioning of local bodies, including municipal corporations and municipalities in Tamil Nadu – under which Greater Chennai Corporation works – (Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919, Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920, Madurai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1971, and Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981) were amended in 2019 and immediately given assent by the Governor. As per the bye-laws, storage, supply, transport, sale and distribution of any of the 14 banned items, including carry bags, cups or plates, would attract a fine of Rs. 25,000 the first time, Rs. 50,000 the second and Rs. 1 lakh the third. Similarly, the use and distribution of such plastics in large commercial establishments, including grocery shops and pharmaceutical shops, would attract a fine of Rs. 1,000 the first time, Rs. 2,000 the second and Rs. 5,000 the third. For smaller traders, the fine amounts are nominal and they would be asked to pay Rs. 100 the first time, Rs. 200 the second and Rs. 500 the third. If a person commits the breach for a fourth time, the trade licence shall be cancelled.[8]

Conclusion

If one goes and sees Nehru Place market today, a prime location in South Delhi, the ground is littered with plastics. Ignore the buzz, if you can for a moment, the place looks like an abandoned one – abandoned by us not the Government. It makes one sad if not hopeless!

However, much has visibly also changed for good. We do not get polybags with vegetable and fruit vendors. Restaurants are using biodegradable/biodesposable  straws. Take-aways are not being given in single-use plastic boxes anymore.

As per a report, teams of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) and urban local bodies (ULBs) issued a total of 119 fines on 11.07.2022 amounting to Rs. 1.23 crore. The actions also lead to shutting factories and market units that were caught violating norms. The DPCC teams inspected 96 units, out of which 59 units were fined and closed. ULBs inspected 529 units across Delhi markets, of which 330 were found violating the ban and 60 were fined. A total fine amount of Rs. 30,000/- was collected by ULBs and around 16,359 kilos of banned SUP items were collected on 11.07.2022.[9]

The issue of plastics will clearly take some time to go but gone it will be in the light of government working in full vigour towards elimination of plastics in phases. The initiative taken by the Indian Government is not a papaya step. If seen against the fact that people have gone unemployed and have lost their businesses across the country in this process,[10] the initiative needs to be supported by one and all to make this worth – because when it comes to plastics that lasts perpetually in the environment, every plastic counts and so does the smallest of initiatives taken by individuals. But beyond these impacts, the ban is bound to also boost the R&D. Along with Government encouraging the innovations, the companies will also be forced to rethink their designs and sourcing of sustainable materials. It should also have a cultural impact where it should help shift consumer mind-sets into not using or littering plastics. In this light, at least one can see a silver lining in the background of the international and national efforts in process and intense work being undertaken at local levels and above all with consciousness of the people.


[1] https://www.breakfreefromplastic.org/2021/10/25/the-coca-cola-company-and-pepsico-named-top-plastic-polluters-for-the-fourth-year-in-a-row/#:~:text=October%2025%2C%202021%20%E2%80%94%20The%20Coca,for%20fueling%20the%20climate%20crisis.

[2] The list has been taken from https://newsable.asianetnews.com/india/india-plastic-ban-do-you-know-what-plastic-products-are-not-banned–resnbc

[3] For statistics please visit https://www.un.org/pga/73/plastics/

[4] https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/reducing-single-use-plastic-pollution-unified-approach

[5] In 2019 there has been an invention of a “fake plastic” by a woman by the name Sharon Barak who is a chemical engineer from Israel. Her product has 100% eco-friendly materials. It feels, looks and functions like plastic, but at the same time immediately dissolves in water. The most surprising part is that such water solution is potable. Her start-up runs by the name Solutum and is available at https://www.solutum.co/. The invention, whenever it comes in the market, may take the world by storm.

[6] https://www.deccanherald.com/special-features/increase-plastics-thickness-but-don-t-ban-them-kspa-767774.html

[7] Available at http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Draft%20Plastic%20Waste%20Management%20Bye%20laws%202021.pdf

[8] https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/penalties-for-violation-of-plastic-ban-announced/article26461249.ece

[9] https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/delhi-govt-starts-issuing-penalties-for-violating-plastic-ban-rule-101657582400074.html]

[10] After the ban on single-use plastic in the state since 2016, over 2 lakh people have lost jobs directly, and the industry incurred a loss of Rs 800 crores so far. [https://www.deccanherald.com/special-features/increase-plastics-thickness-but-don-t-ban-them-kspa-767774.html]

0

Understanding Plastic Ban In India And Worldwide: Part II

Why Ban Single-Use Plastic?

What we are surrounded with is fuel based plastic. As per UNEP, 98 per cent of single-use plastic products are produced from fossil fuel, or “virgin” feedstock. The production, use and disposal of conventional fossil fuel-based plastics alone contributes to a large amount of  greenhouse gas emissions associated which are predicted to grow to 19 per cent of the global carbon budget by 2040.

Being long chain polymers, plastics are most durable and the nature cannot break them down. They can only be recycled into other products. However, 90% of the plastic is never recycled as it is lost in rivers, seas and land litter.[1] In the environment it breaks up into smaller and smaller pieces called ‘micro plastics’ (maximum of 5 mm) and finally ends up getting into the food chain causing several health issues in ecosystem including grave effect on human health[2]. Most adversely affected is water due to leaching of additives, colorants, stabilizers and fillers present in the different categories of plastic products.[3] As on date, the EU Parliament has recorded that more than 80% of marine litter is plastic. Plastic accumulates in seas, oceans and on beaches in the EU and worldwide. Plastic residues are found in marine species – such as sea turtles, seals, whales and birds, but also in fish and shellfish, and therefore in the human food chain.

Half of the plastic produced and consumed worldwide (which is 300 million tons) is single-use plastic. Single-use plastic also forms large part of the litter that never goes for recycling because of small size of products they are used in (e.g. straws, bags, and cutlery etc.) Such small sized products made of single-use plastic are lost in soil, water/drainage or blown away by wind when littered, much faster than other plastics. It is also vital to understand that single-use plastic, specially cannot be recycled because the products made out of it are usually too small for the machines to process and they get stuck in the machines. The recyclers too, often, decline to accept and recycle such plastics in their facility.

Where all plastics are banned?

As per UNEP report[4], 127 out of 192 countries reviewed had adopted some form of legislation to regulate plastic bags as of July 2018. Among these countries, government interventions have been made varying from reduction in the manufacture, distribution, use and trade of plastics bags, imposing high tax on plastic manufacturing and setting recycling targets. The most common form of regulation, however, is the ban on free retail distribution, which 83 countries have adopted. 61 countries have adopted ban on manufacturing and import. 27 countries have enacted law imposing ban on single-use plastics — either on identified products (e.g. plates, cups, straws, packaging), materials (e.g. polystyrene) or production levels. Till 2018, however, none of these bans were “total”.[5]

In 2002, Bangladesh became the first country in the world to implement a ban on thin plastic bags, when it was found that they played a key role in clogging drainage systems resulting in disastrous flooding countrywide. Other countries began to follow suit.

Plastic bags have been banned in Rwanda since 2008, with strict policies that include luggage searches at the border where any plastic bags found are confiscated. Anyone found violating the plastic bag ban law may receive a fine or, in more serious cases, a prison sentence.[6]

The EU has acted against plastic pollution too. From July 2, 2021, single-use plastic plates, cutlery, straws, balloon sticks and cotton buds cannot be placed on the markets of the EU Member States. In addition, the same measure applies to cups, food and beverage containers made of expanded polystyrene, and all products made of oxo-degradable plastic. Oxo-degradable or “oxo”-biodegradable, are made of bio-additives, such as starch added to polyethylene (PE). These are often falsely marketed as being biodegradable, when they are only degradable.

Wondering about U.S. and China? US has not passed any law as on date despite the fact that the U.S. is one of the world’s largest producers of plastic waste. Out of the plastics littered, it recycles only 5-6%. A major part is exported to developing countries to recycle. As per the CNBC report[7] U.S. Interior Department[8] issued an order on June 8, 2022 to reduce the procurement, sale and distribution of such products and packaging.

China has imposed a limited ban on January 1, 2021 by prohibiting restaurants in the country from providing single-use plastic straws and stores from providing plastic shopping bags in the major cities.

Russia has not imposed banned on plastics yet.

INDIA

India has a whooping per capita plastic consumption of 11 kgs. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Report (2019-20) states that 3.5 million metric tonnes of plastic waste are generated in India annually. India generates 25,940 tons of plastic waste every day but collects only 60 percent of it.

India is attempting to phase out plastics with a legislative framework set out in 2016.

LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK

The first-ever law on waste management was in the form of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules notified in 2000. Thereafter, the Government, under overarching campaign of “Clean and Green”, came up with Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016 (PWMR), Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2018 and most recently, Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2021 and Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2022.

Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 for the first time provided for “extended producer responsibility” (EPR) denied under section 3(21) to mean “responsibility of any producer of packaging products such as plastic, tin, glass and corrugated boxes, etc., for environmentally sound management, till end-of-life of the packaging product.”

Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016/PWMR were made by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change and notified on March 18, 2016[9] in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 3, 6 and 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. These were in supersession of the Plastic Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2011 published by the Government of India in the erstwhile Ministry of Environment and Forests.

The PWMR, under Rule 4, sets conditions on manufacture, import, stocking, distribution, sale and use of carry bags, plastic sheets or like, or cover made of plastic sheet and multilayered packaging. The PWMR separately defines “carry bags” under Rule 3(c) to mean “bags made from plastic material or compostable plastic material, used for the purpose of carrying or dispensing commodities which have a self carrying feature but do not include bags that constitute or form an integral part of the packaging in which goods are sealed prior to use.” “Multilayered packaging” as per Rule 3(n) means “any material used or to be used for packaging and having at least one layer of plastic as the main ingredients in combination with one or more layers of materials such as paper, paper board, polymeric materials, metalised layers or aluminium foil, either in the form of a laminate or co-extruded structure.

The conditions that have been imposed under Rule 3 of PWMR are:

  • Carry bags to be in natural shade with no or only BIS approved added pigments/colorants.
  • Carry bags or products made of recycled plastic not to be used for storing, carrying, dispensing or packaging ready to eat or drink food stuff.
  • carry bag made of virgin plastic (i.e. plastic material which has not been subjected to use earlier and has also not been blended with scrap or waste) or recycled plastic, shall not be less than 50 microns in thickness.
  • plastic sheet or like, which is not an integral part of multilayered packaging, not to be less than 50 microns in thickness except where the thickness of such plastic sheets impair the functionality of the product.
  • the manufacturers have been restricted from selling or providing or arranging plastic to be used as raw material to an unregistered producer. Rule 13 of the PWMR provides for registration of producers, recyclers and manufacturers.
  • sachets using plastic material not to be used for storing, packing or selling gutkha, tobacco and pan masala. It is a blanket ban. New packaging made of aluminium and paper has been introduced for packing gutkas instead.
  • recycling of plastic waste to conform with the BIS.
  • The provision of thickness shall not be applicable to carry bags made up of compostable plastic. As per Rule 3(e) “compostable plastics” mean “plastic that undergoes degradation by biological processes during composting to yield carbon dioxide, water, inorganic compounds and biomass at a rate consistent with other known compostable materials, excluding conventional petro-based plastics, and does not leave visible, distinguishable or toxic residue”.
  • plastic material, in any form including Vinyl Acetate – Maleic Acid – Vinyl Chloride Copolymer, shall not be used in any package for packaging gutkha, pan masala and tobacco in all forms.

Rule 5 addresses the issue of Plastic Waste Management through recycling by plastic waste recycler, local bodies encouraging the use of plastic waste – preferably the plastic waste which cannot be further recycled – for road construction as per Indian Road Congress, disposal of thermo set plastic waste and disposal of inert from recycling or processing facilities of plastic waste.

‘Thermoset polymers’ or ‘inert waste’ was not defined in the Rules initially.  It was only in 2021 that the definition of “Thermoset plastic”was introduced by way of amendment. ‘Thermoset polymers’ are material, especially, a synthetic plastic or resin that hardens permanently after one application of heat and pressure. These polymers are found in car parts and electrical appliances and thus, have to be durable and heat-resistant. However, typically these cannot be easily recycled or broken down after use.

Inert waste, as different from hazardous and non-hazardous waste, is waste which is neither chemically nor biologically reactive. This in turn means that it takes a long time to dispose of and sometimes it does not get decomposed at all. However, it is not dangerous to health. The problem however lies elsewhere. This kind of waste takes a lot of space and since it takes a long time to decompose or does not decompose at all, it just occupies space. The inert waste would include concrete, rubble, sands, clay, soil and chalk.

The PWMR also make local bodies liable for segregation, collection, storage, transportation, processing and disposal of the plastic waste, to see that no damage is caused to the environment during this process, creating awareness among all stakeholders, engaging civil societies or groups working with waste pickers and ensuring that open burning of plastic waste does not take place.

The most notable feature of the Rules is that it extends the liability to the Gram Panchayats. This is because it is only recently that the plastics, on account of the mini and micro packaging and sachet/pouch culture have found its way to the villages in India.

The PWMR separately impose responsibility on waste generators to minimize generation of plastic waste and segregate plastic waste at source and ensure segregated storage of waste at source and handover segregated waste to urban local body or gram panchayats or agencies appointed by them or registered waste pickers’, registered recyclers or waste collection agencies. All waste generators are required to pay ‘user fee or charge’ as may be specified in the byelaws of the local bodies for plastic waste management such as waste collection or operation of the facility. The waste generators also include every person organizing an event in open space, which involves service of food stuff in plastic or multilayered packaging. Such person is required to segregate and manage the waste generated during such events as per Rule 8(4) of the PWMR.

Rule 9 provides for the responsibility of the producers, importers and brand owners to register itself under the Rules. As per the Rules, the primary responsibility for collection of used multi-layered plastic sachet or pouches or packaging is of producers, importers and brand owners who introduce the products in the market. They need to establish a system for collecting back the plastic waste generated due to their products. The manufacture and use of non- recyclable multilayered plastic, if any, by the producers, importers and brand owners is required to be phased out in two years time.

Retailers and street vendors are prohibited under PWMR to sell or provide commodities to consumer in carry bags or plastic sheet or multilayered packaging, which are not manufactured and labelled or marked, as per prescribed under the Rules. Plastic carry bag is to be provided by only those vendors that are registered. Carry bags in such shops shall be chargeable.

What essentially the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016 has done is also to increase the minimum thickness of plastics to 50 micron and then 75 microns for plastic sheets, to facilitate collection and recycle of plastic waste, expand the applicability to rural areas, introduce responsibilities of producers and generators in plastic waste management including their registrations for monitoring them, to promote use of plastic waste for road construction, introduction of Extended Producer Responsibility on the producers (i.e persons engaged in manufacture, or import of carry bags, multi-layered packaging and sheets or like and the persons using these for packaging or wrapping their products) and brand owners, and restrictions on retailers and street vendors for giving out plastics carry bags amongst other things.

Plastic Waste Management (Amendment) Rules 2018[10] were notified on March 27, 2018. It added the definition of “alternate use” to mean “use of material for a purpose other than for which it was conceived, which is beneficial because it promotes resource efficiency”. It also added the definition of “energy recovery”. Multi-layer plastics were further explained as ones that are not only non-recyclable but also non-energy recoverable and with no alternative use.

Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2021[11], notified on August 12, 2021, introduced definitions of “Single-use plastic commodity”, “Thermoset plastic” and “Thermoplastic”. The amendments prohibited the use of plastics of less than seventy five microns in thickness with effect from the 30th September, 2021 and one hundred and twenty (120) microns in thickness with effect from the 31st December, 2022. It additionally placed two more conditions in PWMR that the manufacture, import, stocking, distribution, sale and use of identified single-use plastic items including commodities made of polystyrene and expanded polystyrene, shall be prohibited with effect from the 1st July, 2022 which included ear buds with plastic sticks, plastic sticks for balloons, plastic flags, candy sticks, ice-cream sticks, polystyrene [thermocol] for decoration, plates, cups, glasses, cutlery such as forks, spoons, knives, straw, trays, wrapping or packing films around sweet boxes, invitation cards, and cigarette packets, plastic or PVC banners less than 100 micron and stirrers. It is also stated in the 2021 Amendment Rules that if there is any further notification which will prohibit the manufacture, import, stocking, distribution, sale and use of carry bags, plastic sheets or like, or cover made of plastic sheets and multilayered packaging and single-use plastic, including polystyrene and expanded polystyrene, commodities, issued after this notification, it shall come not come into force before the expiry of ten years from the date of its publication.    

Plastic Waste Management (Amendment) Rules, 2022[12]

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change on 16.02.2016 notified the Guidelines on the Extended Producer Responsibility for plastic packaging vide Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2022. Directions have been issued to E-commerce companies, leading single use plastic sellers/users, and plastic raw material manufacturers with respect to phasing out of identified single use plastic items. EPR is a kind of reverse collection system to be followed by producers and is based on the established principle of ‘Polluter Pays’.

What is banned in India?

India has banned[13] manufacture, import[14], stocking, distribution, sale and use of identified single use plastic items, which have low utility and high littering potential, all across the country from July 1, 2022. This means if you have single use plastic at home, you cannot use it. You also cannot give it to vendors to use it. Keeping at home may also be considered as stocking. The ban is, however, not blanket ban on single-use plastic items but certain items that have been identified in the notification by the Government. They are Ear buds with plastic sticks, Plastic sticks for balloons, Plastic flags, Candy sticks, Ice-cream sticks, Polystyrene (Thermocol) for decoration, Plastic plates, Cups, glasses, cutlery such as forks, spoons, knives, straw & trays, Wrapping or packing films around sweet boxes, Invitation cards, Cigarette packets, Plastic or PVC banners less than 100 micron and stirrers.  

As on March, 2022, states of Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Tripura, Tamil Nadu, Sikkim, Rajasthan, Punjab, Nagaland, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Lakshadweep, Karnataka, Jharkhand, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Delhi, Daman Diu & Dadra  Nagar Haveli, Chhattisgarh, Chandigarh, Bihar, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Andaman & Nicobar Islands had imposed compete ban i.e. complete ban on manufacture, store, import, distribution, transportation, recycle, sell and use of plastic carry bags.[15] Assam has imposed ban on Plastic carry bags, banners, buntings, cups, cling films, flex, flags, plates, sheets (used for spreading on dining tables irrespective of thickness) including the above items made of thermocol and plastic which use plastic micro beads. Delhi has imposed complete ban on manufacture, import,store, sell & use of plastic products (poly Propylene, non-woven fabric type carry bags), plastic film or plastic tube to pack or cover any book including magazine & invitation/greeting cards.

State of Kerala has imposed the ban on large number of item i.e. complete ban on the manufacture, storage, transport and sale of plastic carry bags( irrespective of thickness); plastic sheets( used as table spread); plates, cups and decorative materials made of thermocol/stryrofoam; SUP items like cups, plates, dishes, spoons, forks, straw, stirrer; plastic coated paper cups, plastic coated paper plates, plastic coated paper bowls, plastic coated paper bags; Non woven bags, plastic flags, plastic bunting; plstic water pouches, non branded plastic juice packets ; plastic juice packets; PET/PETE bottles of drinking water of capacities less than 500 ml; garbage bags (plastic); PVC flex materials and plastic packets.[16]


[1] Global recycling percentage is as low as only 9 per cent as per the Indian Government Notification.

[2] A detailed article on impact of plastics on human health is written by Neeti Rustagi, S. K. Pradhan, and Ritesh Singh and is available at  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3299092/

[3] A complete report has been prepared by UNEP and is available at https://www.unep.org/resources/report/water-pollution-plastics-and-microplastics-review-technical-solutions-source-sea; A quick read can be found at https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/plastic-planet-how-tiny-plastic-particles-are-polluting-our-soil;

[4] Legal Limits on Single-Use Plastics and Microplastics: A Global Review of National Laws and Regulations published in July 2018.

[5] Exceptions exist for certain products or materials, such as for so-called biodegradable plastics.

[6] https://plasticoceans.org/rwanda-plastic-bag-ban

[7] https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/08/us-to-ban-sale-of-single-use-plastic-on-public-lands-national-parks-by-2032.html#:~:text=Group%20%7C%20Getty%20Images-,The%20U.S.%20Interior%20Department%20said%20on%20Wednesday%20it%20will%20phase,recycling%20rate%20continues%20to%20decline.

[8] https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so-3407.pdf

[9] https://pib.gov.in/newsite/printrelease.aspx?relid=138144#:~:text=Based%20on%20the%20recommendations%20of,properties%20lead%20to%20commercial%20success.

[10] https://cms.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/userfiles/PWMnotification%201%20001.pdf

[11] https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2021/aug/doc202181311.pdf

[12] file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/233568.pdf

[13] Please see for details: https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2022/jul/doc20227169001.pdf

[14] An instruction dated 22.06.2022 bearing no. 09/2022  was separately sent by the Ministry of Finance to Commissioner of Customs for restriction on import of products made of plastic.

[15] https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1807646

[16] https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1807646

0

Understanding Plastic Ban In India And Worldwide: Part-I

As per United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), plastic pollution soared from two million tonnes in 1950, to 348 million tonnes in 2017, becoming a global industry valued at $522.6 billion.[1] It is expected to double in capacity, by 2040. Recently, during historic resolution at the UN Environment Assembly in Nairobi on 02.03.2022 to end plastic pollution, Norway’s Minister for Climate and the Environment, Espen Barth Eide lamented, “Plastic pollution has grown into an epidemic.”

This man-made situation is undeniably grave.

Tangible steps have been taken around the world to phase out the use of plastics. Countries after countries have realized that the problem will soon turn fatal. Bangladesh was the first country to realize the magnitude of the problem and immediately imposed ban on plastics in 2002, when the plastics were found to be the reasons for choking of drains and consequential drastic flooding in the country. There is specific checking of luggage for plastics in countries like Rwanda at the airport when the passenger arrives.

India has recently followed the league by systematically and methodically working on the same for the last one decade and more significantly since 2016. Hon’ble Prime Minister Modi while recently addressing the United Nations Conference on Desertification said, “I think the time has come for the world to say goodbye to single-use plastics…” Effective July 1, 2022, India imposed complete ban on identified items made of single-use plastic.

Plastic: The Frankenstein

Plastic is a long chain of synthetic polymers/carbon atoms arranged in repeating units. They are often much longer than those found in nature. This gives it the characteristic strength and flexibility along with light weight. This strength, however, is also the reason that the plastics don’t break down when left alone in the environment. Polymers are naturally present – cellulose being most common of all. Man started producing plastics firstly from these natural polymers and then moved to using carbon atoms from petroleum and other fossil fuels.

As per Directive (EU) 2019/904, ‘plastic’ means “a material consisting of a polymer to which additives or other substances may have been added, and which can function as a main structural component of final products, with the exception of natural polymers that have not been chemically modified.”

As per Rule 3(o) of the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, “plastic” means material which contains as an essential ingredient a high polymer such as polyethylene terephthalate, high density polyethylene, Vinyl, low density polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene resins, multi-materials like acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polyphenylene oxide, polycarbonate, Polybutylene terephthalate.

Plastics have been categorized into seven types as per the method they would be recycled.[2] They are depicted in numbers inside the three arrow triangle recycling symbol. This number is a reference to what type of plastic the container is made of. The category can be checked from the bottom of the plastic container or carry bag. The recycling numbers aid recyclers in the sorting process. All plastics may look alike but they are not. They are made of different molecules or set of molecules which do not mix. Therefore, sorting the plastics before recycling is essential. The recycling code constitutes of the numbers 1 through 7 – PET-Polyethylene terephthalate (eg. Water bottles, dispensing containers, biscuit trays), HDPE-High density polyethylene (eg. Shampoo bottles, milk bottles, freezer bags, ice cream containers), V-Vinyl (PVC) (eg. Blister packaging, wire jacketing, siding, windows, piping), LDPE– Low density polyethylene (eg. Bags, trays, containers, food packaging film), PP-Polypropylene (eg. Potato chip bags, microwave dishes, ice cream tubs, bottle caps, single-use face masks), PS-Polystyrene and Other means all other resins and multi-materials like ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) (eg. Cutlery, plates, cups), PPO (Polyphenylene oxide), PC (Polycarbonate), PBT (Polybutylene terephalate) (eg. Three- and five-gallon water bottles, bullet-proof materials, sunglasses, DVDs, iPod and computer cases, signs and displays, certain food containers, nylon) etc.[3]

The most widely accepted plastics for recycling are number 1 and 2.

Who made Frankenstein?

John Wesley Hyatt made the first synthetic polymer by treating cellulose, derived from cotton fiber, with camphor. This was used as a substitute to ivory and was considered a blessing as it saved brutal elephant killings. Bakelite was the first fully synthetic plastic invented by Leo Baekeland in 1907. As per United Nations Environmental Programme, Polyethylene, the most commonly used plastic, was created by accident at a chemical plant in Northwich, England in 1933. In 1965, one-piece polyethylene shopping bag, designed by engineer Sten Gustaf Thulin, was patented by the Swedish company Celloplast.

It was not until the World War-II that the demand for plastics and for the item made out of it exponentially increased and finally steeply rose in 1970s.[4] Since the 1950s, 8.3 billion metric tons of plastics have been produced, and half of that in the past 15 years alone.[5] As per UNEP, worldwide, one million plastic bags were consumed every minute in 2011.

What is single use plastic?

Any plastic that is made from polymers of HDPE, LDPE, PET, PS, PP, EPS is single use plastic. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), a non-profit organization founded in US in 1970 defines ‘single use plastic’ as “goods that are made primarily from fossil fuel–based chemicals (petrochemicals) and are meant to be disposed of right after use—often, in mere minutes”.

As per Directive (EU) 2019/904 ‘single-use plastic product’ means “a product that is made wholly or partly from plastic and that is not conceived, designed or placed on the market to accomplish, within its life span, multiple trips or rotations by being returned to a producer for refill or re-used for the same purpose for which it was conceived.”

The term ‘single-use plastic’ was not defined under the 2016 rules when the rules were introduced. Vide Plastic Waste Management (Amendment) Rules, 2021, notified by the Ministry on 12.08.2021, a definition of ‘Single-use plastic commodity’ was introduced under sub-rule (va) of Rule 3. It means “a plastic item intended to be used once for the same purpose before being disposed of or recycled.”

Single-use plastics are most commonly used for packaging, plastic bags, and serviceware, such as bottles, stirrers, clamshells, wrappers, straws, and bags.


[1] https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1113142

[2] Rule 11(2) of 2016 Rules.

[3] For details and understanding please visit https://www.unep.org/interactives/beat-plastic-pollution/

[4] https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/birth-ban-history-plastic-shopping-bag#:~:text=2002%20%E2%80%93%20Bangladesh%20is%20the%20first,drainage%20systems%20during%20disastrous%20flooding.

[5] https://www.nrdc.org/stories/single-use-plastics-101#what

0

Recovery Certificate would Qualify as a “Financial Debt” under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and Give Rise to a Fresh Cause of Action

In a recent judgment in Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus A. Balakrishnan & Anr [Civil Appeal No. 689 of 2021], the Hon’ble Supreme Court settled the position w.r.t. the holder of recovery certificate issued under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1992 (“RDB Act”) who shall be a ‘Financial Creditor’ under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC/Code”) and shall have a fresh cause of action to initiate CIRP under section 7 of the Code.

In the present matter, Kotak Mahindra Bank, which procured a recovery certificate from Debt Recovery Tribunal, filed an application under section 7 of the Code on the basis of the recovery certificate. The application was admitted but immediately challenged before the Hon’ble NCLAT which set aside the order of the NCLT on the basis of the cause of action being time barred.

The order of NCLAT was challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on the ground that the application before NCLT was made well within the period of three years from the date on which the recovery certificates were issued and therefore the application under section 7 was within limitation.

The Court set aside the order of NCLAT. The Court upheld the decision in Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy & Anr, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 543 which inter alia held that the a fresh period of limitation period would accrue for an application under Section 7 from the date of a recovery certificate. The Court reasoned that a recovery certificate is a “financial debt” within the unexhausted definition provided under Section 5 (8) of the Code. While an application under section 7 of the IBC may be filed in respect of a ‘default’ which means non-payment of a debt as per section 3 (12) of the Code, “debt” is defined as a “liability in respect of a claim as per Section 3 (11) of the Code, and “claim” in turn, as per section 3(6) of the IBC, means a right to payment, whether or not such right has been reduced to judgment. In this case, the claim has been reduced to judgment by way of a recovery certificate. The Court also went into interpreting Sections 19 (22) and 19 (22A) of the RDB Act and held that they do not restrict initiation of CIRP based on a recovery certificate.

0

HOW TO REVOKE/CANCEL A POWER OF ATTORNEY

A power of attorney is an instrument which is a creature of contract of agency executed between two or more parties authorising the agent to act in on behalf of the principal(s) and act for the benefit of the principal(s). It is called “a document of convenience”[1]. Any act done or document executed by the agent under the strength of power of attorney will be deemed to be the act of or execution by the principal.[2]

A power of attorney (“PoA”) may be revocable or irrevocable[3]. Moreover, a PoA may be general or for a specific purpose. Interestingly, a deed of power of attorney does not require consideration. As per section 185 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, no consideration is necessary to create an agency. PoA is therefore, an exception to sections 10 r/w 23 of the Contract Act which provides that consideration is an essential ingredient of a lawful agreement.

The law regarding power of attorney (“PoA”) is primarily governed by Power of Attorney Act, 1882 (“1882 Act”) and the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (“Contract Act”).  The Stamp Act, 1899 and Registration Act, 1908 also make provisions for the stamping and registration of the instrument.

The Law

The PoA is defined under section 1A of the 1882 Act. According to section 1A, “power-of-attorney” includes any instrument empowering a specified person to act for and in the name of the person executing it.” Section 2(21) the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 also defines the term. It is further governed by Chapter X of the Contract Act where Section 182 of the Contract Act defines ‘agent’. Chapter X is on contract of agency, the effect of it and its termination.

The effect of execution of power of attorney has been succinctly captured under section 2 of the 1882 Act which has been reproduced herein below:

2. Execution under power-of-attorney.—The donee of a power-of-attorney may, if he thinks fit, execute or do any instrument or thing in and with his own name and signature, and his own seal, where sealing is required, by the authority of the donor of the power; and every instrument and thing so executed and done, shall be as effectual in law as if it had been executed or done by the donee of the power in the name, and with the signature and seal, of the donor thereof. This section applies to powers-of-attorney created by instruments executed either before or after this Act comes into force.

Section 4 of the 1882 Act lays down a few requirements for the instrument to be sufficient evidence. As per section 4 of the 1882 Act, it must be supported by an affidavit, statutory declaration or other sufficient evidence which shall be deposited in the High Court/District Court and another set must be maintained for inspection by any person. The copy so deposited may be stamped or marked as a certified copy, and, when so stamped or marked, shall become a certified copy which shall be sufficient evidence of the contents of the instrument and of the deposit thereof in the High Court or District Court, without further proof. The relevant provision of 1882 Act is reiterated herein below:

4. Deposit of original instruments creating powers-of-attorney.— (a) An instrument creating a power-of-attorney, its execution being verified by affidavit, statutory declaration or other sufficient evidence, may, with the affidavit or declaration, if any, be deposited in the High Court 9 [or District Court] within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the instrument may be.

(b) A separate file of instruments so deposited shall be kept; and any person May search that file, and inspect every instrument so deposited; and a certified copy thereof shall be delivered out to him on request.

(c) A copy of an instrument so deposited may be presented at the office and may be stamped or marked as a certified copy, and, when so stamped or marked, shall become and be a certified copy.

(d) A certified copy of an instrument so deposited shall, without further proof, be sufficient evidence of the contents of the instrument and of the deposit thereof in the High Court 1 [or District Court].

(e) The High Court may, from time to time, make rules for the purposes of this section, and prescribing, with the concurrence of the State Government, the fees to be taken under clauses (a), (b) and (c).

g) This section applies to instruments creating powers-of-attorney executed either before or after this Act comes into force.

In practice, the power of attorney is executed in front of two witnesses and a notary public. Notarisation has the effect of registration. This shall essentially change if it is a special power of attorney executed say, for sale of property. Registration shall become mandatory in such cases and the parties will also be liable to pay the stamp duty as per Article 48 of the Schedule of the Stamp Act. As per the judgments of the Apex Court, a PoA is strictly construed.[4] Therefore, a deed of power of attorney needs to be very carefully worded. If it a PoA for sale of property, the power should also expressly authorise the power to agent to execute the sale deed and must include power to present the document before the Registrar and to admit execution of the document before the Registrar. 

Revocation or termination of power of attorney

As per the Contract Act, agency can be revoked by either the principal or the agent. The revocation may be expressed or implied by conduct. Such contract of agency will get automatically revoked on death of principal or agent or them becoming of unsound mind. Additionally, it is revoked by operation of law on principal being adjudicated insolvent. The only exception to it is in case where agent has an interest in subject matter of agency. As per section 202 of the Contract Act, the agency cannot be revoked to the prejudice of such interest. Further, the agency can be revoked at any time before the authority has been exercised. However, if an agency is to continue for any period of time, the party prematurely revoking the agency, without any sufficient cause, must compensate the other.

The termination or revocation of the agency may or may not immediately come into effect. Section 208 of the Contract Act stipulates that the termination of the authority of the agent will take effect only when it becomes known to the agent. Similarly, it will take effect as regards the third party when it becomes known to the third party.

These provisions equally apply in case of a PoA. The party, however, has to follow a procedure. For an express revocation, the party is required to issue a notice to the other party stating the reasons for revocation, the effective date and consequences of the revocation. In case of an unregistered PoA it is advisable that the party also issues a public notice in local newspapers. The third party, if any, is further required to be put to notice.

In case of a registered deed of PoA, the party must register the deed for cancellation/revocation after preparing the cancellation deed which must again state the reasons for revocation, the effective date and consequences of the revocation. The principal is then required to serve the copy of the cancellation deed to the agent/attorney. In case of registered PoA also, one is advised to make a newspaper publication of such cancellation.

The aspect of cancellation is crucial since the veracity of documents executed by an agent on the strength of the PoA come into question on the ground of him not having a valid PoA because of alleged termination/cancellation of PoA before the time when the agent executed such document.

The issue regarding the revocation of a registered PoA was addressed most recently in Amar Nath v. Gian Chand [2022 SCC OnLine SC 102] by the Hon’ble Apex Court. In the said matter the plaintiff had executed a special power of attorney in favour of the Defendant No. 2 for the sale of plaintiff’s property in favour of Defendant No. 1. The Defendant No. 1 was not in a position to arrange for money. Therefore, Defendant No. 2 surrendered the original power of attorney to the plaintiff and the plaintiff drew a cut line on it and wrote ‘cancelled’. He also told Defendant No. 1 that the same stood cancelled. Subsequently, Defendant No. 2, allegedly in collusion with Defendant No. 1, applied for the copy of the power of attorney, and fraudulently executed the sale deed in between themselves for a consideration of Rs. 30,000/-. The mutation was also sanctioned. On becoming aware of it, the plaintiff challenged the sale deed by filing a suit for declaration by way of permanent injunction mainly on the grounds firstly that the Defendant No. 2, during the registration of the sale deed, could not have produced the original PoA before the registering officer under Registration Act and secondly, the sale deed was executed without authority since special power of attorney was deemed to have been cancelled.

The lower courts declined the relief sought by the plaintiff.  The High Court proceeded to set aside the findings of the lower courts and held that the mutation showing the sale in favour of the Defendant no. 1 was null and void. The High Court relied on Section 18A of the Registration Act and held that it was necessary for the Registering Authority to see the true copy of the special power of attorney. Since original power of attorney was cancelled, the same could not be relied upon by the Registering Authority for the purpose of execution of the sale deed.

The Apex Court in the very beginning observed that Section 18A contemplates the production of a true copy of a document which is sought to be registered. In the present case it was the sale deed which was to be registered and the production of the sale deed is not in question. The Court then went on to analyse the applicability of other provisions under section 32, 33 and 34 of the Registration Act and held that there was a certified copy of power of attorney which authorised Defendant No. 2 and if it was not cancelled (as per law) and he had executed the sale deed, he is within his rights to present the documents before the registering officer. Further, the duty of the Registering Officer extends only to enquire and find that such person is the person who has executed the document he has presented and further be satisfied about the identity of the person. On the contention of the plaintiff that original power of attorney was cancelled by cutting it and writing on it ‘cancelled’ and thus Defendant No. 2 had no authority thereafter, the Court, in this regard, observed that the power of attorney was registered. The plaintiff neither did get the power of attorney cancelled at the Sub-Registrar Office nor did he send any notice of cancellation. The Court clarified that “This we say as even in the absence of a registered cancellation of the power of attorney, there must be cancellation and it must further be brought to the notice of the third party at any rate as already noticed.” Therefore, the making of a cancellation deed, its registration as well as notice to the donee/agent/power of attorney holder are equally essential for a valid revocation of power of attorney.


[1] State of Rajasthan v. BasantNahata, (2005) 12 SCC 77]

[2] It was held in A.C. Narayanan v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 11 SCC 790 thatThe power-of-attorney holder is the agent of the grantor. When the grantor authorises the attorney holder to initiate legal proceedings and the attorney holder accordingly initiates such legal proceedings, he does so as the agent of the grantor and the initiation is by the grantor represented by his attorney holder and not by the attorney holder in his personal capacity…However, we make it clear that the power-of-attorney holder cannot file a complaint in his own name as if he was the complainant. In other words, he can initiate criminal proceedings on behalf of the principal.

[3] Suraj Lamp and Industries Private Limited vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (2012) 1 SCC 656

[4] Church of Christ Charitable Trust & Educational Charitable Society v. Ponniamman Educational Trust, (2012) 8 SCC 706

1 6 7 8 9 10 14

You cannot copy content of this page

Left Menu Icon

DISCLAIMER & CONFIRMATION

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner.

By clicking “Proceed” button below and accessing this website (www.nautiliyaalegal.com), the user fully accepts that he/she is seeking information of his/her own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by the firm or its members.

The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for information purposes only. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. The firm is not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.